Because it is such a gray day, let me spread some sunshine.
11/18/2013-3/1/2014
|
11/18/2014-3/1/15
|
+/- change
| |
Fiction
|
2072
|
2334
|
+262
|
NonFiction
|
1192
|
1971
|
+779
|
Total Checkouts (minus Everybody)
|
3819
|
4958
|
+1139
|
Looking more closely to the Nonfiction section, here is a breakdown by Dewey 100's.
Dewey
100’s
|
11/18/13-3/1/14
|
11/18/14-3/1/15
|
+/-
change
|
000-099
|
15
|
37
|
+22
|
100-199
|
13
|
10
|
-3
|
200-299
|
23
|
10
|
-13
|
300-399
|
116
|
165
|
+49
|
400-499
|
16
|
10
|
-6
|
500-599
|
348
|
418
|
+70
|
600-699
|
300
|
364
|
+64
|
700-799
|
238
|
451
|
+213
|
800-899
|
61
|
172
|
+111
|
900-999
|
62
|
334
|
+272
|
Looking even closer still, there are some MAJOR upward trends in the 700-999 Dewey classifications. But why? I wish I could get more detailed data. I wonder if, when we are able to set location fields for all of the titles, we will be able to get data detailed to the location field. I hope so because I think that will help define the checkout trends.
So at this point, I can only hypothesize. In the 700's, perhaps this is due to the weeding of unappealing titles and greater visibility of the "What Can I Make?" section. The books were relocated to vertical bookcases. Vertical shelves seem to attract more visitors but I am not sure why. Moving on to the 800's, I am even more baffled. I know that I am not seeing poetry books flying off the shelves. My joke books are constantly checked out so that accounts for some of the increase. But I don't have an abundance of joke books. But, perhaps, over a period of months of the shelf being continuously bare, the joke books are more of a factor than I realize. The 900's are the Dewey grouping that I feel most confident hypothesizing about. I think this is attributed to the biographies being moved into the subject areas. I have seen more sports biographies, technology biographies, military biographies and biographies of performing artists checked out than ever. This makes me want to take a harder look at the "Who Is?" category to see if more can be recategorized (assuming my hypothesis is true). There has also been an upward trend in the "Where In The U.S.A Is" and "American History" collections.
I think it may be time for some discussions with the library office, and maybe Follett, about teasing out the data and getting the location fields in place.
No comments:
Post a Comment